[asterisk-users] Using asterisk as the recording server

[Steve Totaro]

>
> > Again, how many calls were you able record using RAMdisk?  Anywhere 300?
>
> As I stated before, this is going to be dependent on how you're
> manipulating the calls and the gear you're running on. The nice thing
> about your 'just broadcast the entire LAN to the recording solution'
> is that the recording service just gets to throw away everything
> that's not an audio channel, and it doesn't have to do squat to the
> call. If it COULDN'T do a lot of recordings under these circumstances
> it wouldn't be worth any money.
>
> I don't think I've pushed my solution past 90 simultaneous recordings
> of MeetMe() mixing, with more than 100 AGI channels running, with
> assorted ChanSpy() jobs.
>
> > Bookmark my post, so when you reach your RAMDisk limit, you can join the
> big
> > league.
>
> Anything I do as a scaling solution will be price versus performance.
> So since we're talking about a commercial solution to replace
> something that asterisk does, I'll have to find out what your
> commercial solution costs per channel, and compare that against the
> cost of cloning out an identical server. My solution scales to
> parallel servers just fine.
>
> Is OrecX really $199 per recorded channel? So that 300 channels you're
> talking about costs $60,000? So I can buy six $10,000 servers, each of
> which can run circles around my current solution, and still break
> even. I like my solution better.
>
>
OrecX has a free version.  I guess you didin't really check it out since
your mind was already made up.

300+ Simultaneous calls recorded in perfect clarity for the price of an R200
or if you want higher end, a DL360

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090908/cbaf0f52/attachment.htm