[asterisk-users] OT - mISDN and B410P questions

[Jean-Denis Girard]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Olivier a écrit :
|
|
| 2009/10/24 Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf
| <mailto:jd.girard at sysnux.pf>>
|
| Olivier a écrit :
| | Hello,
| |
| | I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term
| | workaround, in case latest Dahdi is not stable enough for what we are
| | planning to do (we wish to use Junghanns and Digium BRI hardware with
| | Asterisk 1.6) .
|
| Dahdi has been working fine for me for a few months, using a Junghanns
| DuoBRI and asterisk-1.6. I have used bristuff before, it usually worked
| fine, but separate patch. I also tried chan_misdn but quickly abandoned.
|
|
|> Do you mean you abondoned chan_misdn (1.1.9-1) with 1.6.x on Junghanns
|> hardware or are you thinking about another combination ?
|
|> Did you change because revision-2822-enabled Dahdi ran successfully
|> enough that you didn't need to further try with misdn or because you met
|> bloking issues ?

Sorry if that my post was not clear. I'm using Dahdi because I'm happy
with it. It works and is simple to set up: it does not need any external
patch / software.

Before BRI support in Dahdi, I used BRIstuff, which worked fine, but
didn't follow Asterisk releases. And it was more work to set up.

I tried mISDN, but then I depended on specific kernel versions. I also
had echo problems. So I quickly abandoned mISDN.

The conclusion is that I'm very happy with BRI support in Dahdi. I've
been waiting for it, probably for more than 5 years !


Regards,
- --
Jean-Denis Girard

SysNux                  Systèmes  Linux  en Polynésie française
http://www.sysnux.pf/   Tél: +689 50 10 40 / GSM: +689 79 75 27
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAkrlyAsACgkQuu7Rv+oOo/hvTgCfaPXjHD90VpeNlSMH/GPY9bzk
jvMAn2hzE3JWJ/iY+LXf7Zj6hfHPcT2R
=caOJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----