[asterisk-users] Need opinion about GSM codec for Internet

[Martin]

If you doesn't need transcoding, you doesn't need any licenses...
Martin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vinícius Fontes" <vinicius at canall.com.br>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Need opinion about GSM codec for Internet


In my opinion, GSM sounds great but not as good as G.729. So if you can't afford 
getting G.729, GSM is the way to go.



Vinícius Fontes
www.asteriskforum.com.br - Informações e discussão sobre Asterisk e telefonia IP



----- "Alejandro Cabrera Obed" <aco1967 at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Dear all, I have implemented an Asterisk SIP server for a WAN VPN over
> Internet. We have users distributed along all my country (Argentina)
> that register to my Asterisk in order to talk among them.
>
> I'll plan to have voice and voicemail with GSM codec, because we can't
> afford the payment for the G.729 licenses (it's an administrative
> problem of our company, not an echonomical problem). So in this way
> Asterisk won't care about codec traslations, this sounds good.
>
> What do you think about the use of GSM codec for Internet calls ??? Do
> you think GSM is the best narrow-band codec if I can't use G.729 ???
>
> Thank you !!!
>
> Alejandro
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users