[asterisk-users] New CentOS 5 repo: dahdi, asterisk, freepbx RPMs

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 01:07:53PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:

> The packages at ATrpms try to be as upstream/vanilla/generic as
> possible, I wouldn't want to base them on a downstream project like
> AsteriskNOW (I even try to keep any RHEL/Fedora specifics out of them,
> so people can even rebuild on other rpm platforms). As you wrote in a
> trimmed part of the mail, for example relying on the downstream of
> AsteriskNOW resulted in forgetting setting up init files needed for
> standalone operation.
> 
> But serving a downstream project is a different beast and worthwhile
> doing it. Are there any bits in the ATrpms packages that need
> adjustment/fixing wrt AsteriskNOW? If so is it possible to keep the
> packages still generic, and FHS/LSB compliant?

OTOH, there seem to be some 6 or so sets of packages of Asterisk et al.

There is no real reason for that. Apart from the National Institutes of
Health (NIH).

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir