[asterisk-users] Hardware suggestions
Jeff LaCoursiere
jeff at jeff.net
Thu Mar 19 15:03:46 CDT 2009
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Mike wrote:
>> You can reliably run asterisk on just about any x86 hardware. You don't
>> mention what kind of stresses you are going to put on it, so your sizing
>> questions are impossible to answer. How many extensions? How many
>> simultaneous calls? Will you be transcoding? Routing to/from the PSTN?
>> What cards will you be putting in the box? Some cards don't play nicely
>> together if forced to share interrupts, for example.
>
>
> I wasn't worried about sizing (let's imagine that this is more than enough
> for now and less than I'll need later). More about whether this was the
> right BRAND more than the right hardware. Does HP make Asterisk friendly
> hardware? I know Dells was problems a few years back.
AFAIK (there's that acronym again :):) ), the Dell issues were related to
interrupt sharing and multiple PSTN interface cards. You mention below
SIP/SIP only, so I wouldn't worry. The HP should be fine.
>
> As for CPU, the question is mostly one about more GHz or more cores? Dual
> cores are cheaper by GHz. What`s best for Asterisk?
That's actually a decent question. Anyone have any benchmarks? It is the
transcoding that will eat your CPU. I think with minimal transcoding you
would have a hard time overloading a 2.4GHz machine before other factors
came into play.
>
> I am doing only SIP to SIP calls. Some transcoding (half calls are G711 to
> G729, the other half are G729 both ways).
>
> [snip]
>
>> I'm shooting from the hip here, but I don't think dual CPU gives you
> redundancy. If one chip fries I am pretty sure the machine will crash.
>
> This was sort of a question disguised as a statement. Can a CPUs function
> when it's neighbour is fried?
>
Certainly the machine will crash, and I doubt it would boot on one CPU if
the other is still installed and shorting out its pins :)
I think David is completely correct. If you want a redundant setup, run
multiple smaller cheaper machines with a load balancing front end. Stay
away from single points of failure.
j
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list