[asterisk-users] in which asterisk version is zaptel removed?
Vieri
rentorbuy at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 10 11:38:34 CDT 2009
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> wrote:
> But it will still be able to build vs. zaptel, and read
> configuration
> from zapata.conf .
>
> See
> http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4/Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt
Sorry to get back on this silly compilation issue. Also, I'll probably be migrating to dahdi anyway but nevertheless I'd like to understand why I can't upgrade seamlessly from 1.4.21.2 to 1.4.23.1 w/zaptel.
I suppose that chan_dahdi.so must be built even if I want to use zaptel since chan_zap.c is not available anymore.
I have an automated build script which runs the following:
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --inf
odir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var --with-gsm=internal --with-popt --wi
th-z --without-qt --without-oss --with-ssl --without-asound --with-cap --with-cu
rl --with-h323=/usr/share/openh323 --with-imap --without-newt --with-odbc --with
-netsnmp --with-misdn --with-isdnnet --with-mysql --with-pwlib=/usr/share/pwlib
--with-speex --with-iksemel --with-radius --without-sqlite --with-vorbis --with-
ogg --with-zaptel --with-pri --with-tonezone --without-dahdi --without-pri --wit
hout-tonezone --without-tds --with-postgres --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
It locates zaptel stuff:
checking for ZT_DIAL_OP_CANCEL in zaptel/zaptel.h... yes
checking for ZT_PARAMS.chan_alarms... yes
checking for ZT_EVENT_REMOVED in zaptel/zaptel.h... yes
checking for zt_transcoder_info in zaptel/zaptel.h... no
but the net result is that my zap devices don't work before the build doesn't produce neither chan_zap.so nor chan_dahdi.so.
If I pass --with-dahdi to the configure script it will obviously fail because it won't find dahdi header files.
(I'd rather not run configure without parameters because I'm in a sandbox)
As I said, this isn't critical but I'd like to know why it's failing.
Thanks,
Vieri
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list