[asterisk-users] Parked Calls in 1.4.23.1
Darrick Hartman
dhartman at djhsolutions.com
Mon Mar 9 23:59:19 CDT 2009
Leif Madsen wrote:
> Darrick Hartman wrote:
>> I know the call parking feature changed in 1.4.23.1 to fix some serious
>> issues. I'm seeing a major change though which I find disturbing.
>>
>> A person parks a call by transferring it to the parking position (700).
>> When the timeout value is reached, the call is NOT returned to that
>> device, but rather the 's' extension of the phone's registered context
>> (in this case [unrestricted]).
>>
>> -- Executing [700 at unrestricted:1] Park("SIP/100-08217d38", "") in
>> new stack
>> == Parked SIP/100-08217d38 on 701 at parkedcalls. Will timeout back to
>> extension [unrestricted] s, 1 in 60 seconds
>> -- Added extension '701' priority 1 to parkedcalls
>> -- <SIP/100-08217d38> Playing 'digits/7' (language 'en')
>> -- <SIP/100-08217d38> Playing 'digits/0' (language 'en')
>> -- <SIP/100-08217d38> Playing 'digits/1' (language 'en')
>> -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/100-08217d38
>>
>>
>> Is there any way to have the call returned to the device that parked the
>> call (without creating a separate context for each device).
>>
>> For now I created an extension in the [unrestricted] context which sends
>> the call back to the IVR menu, but that's just annoying to the person
>> who placed the call. It should come back to the original device that
>> parked the call. Always did before.
>
>
> There will be a couple of new release candidates going out tomorrow morning. Can
> you test them once they are announced to determine if this is still an issue? If
> so, then I would suggest you verify the bug does not exist on the bug tracker
> already, and if it doesn't, then you can open a new issue.
This was probably a miss-use of the system by me as explained by someone
else off-list, but perhaps it's still a bug. It ONLY happens with blind
transfers. If you use an attended transfer, the behavior works as
expected. This is a change from past behavior, but it makes more sense
to use an attended transfer to the parking location OR the one step park
feature instead.
Darrick
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list