[asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton
Giorgio Incantalupo
gincantalupo at fgasoftware.com
Mon Mar 2 07:45:06 CST 2009
Hi Olivier,
so if you say that Patton hardware is bad documented, hard to configured
and without echo canceller I think it is useless...don't you think?
Unless it is much more reliable (no crashes at all)....
Olivier wrote:
>
>
> 2009/3/2 Giorgio Incantalupo <gincantalupo at fgasoftware.com
> <mailto:gincantalupo at fgasoftware.com>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using telephone cards for 4-5 years and now I'm considering
> the Patton gateways. What are the pro and cons of Patton stuff
> compared
> to internal cards in a production system? Someone say external gateway
> are better because has no echo but have a longer delay when
> placing calls.
> Any suggestion appreciated.
>
>
> I would be cautious regarding echo performance, as enhanced echo
> cancelling software are now available on some telephony cards (HPEC,
> OSLEC, ...) and I can't see at the moment (experience will tell) why
> Patton gateways would perform any better or worse than telephony
> cards. I would be very curious to read other testimonies on that.
>
> On another topic, I would say those gateway are not so easy to configure :
> - a web server is embeded but it is not documented anywhere and it's
> GUI is far from natural,
> - alternatively, you can edit a config file for which a huge doc is
> available but, as this boxes are not specifically designed to work
> with Asterisk, doc is not easy to understand (it took me 3 days to
> find how to register a gateway to an Asterisk server).
>
> Anyway, configuring ISDN ports is easy and the range of possibilities
> is larger than with telephony cards :
> - BRI/PRI, TE/NT, PtP/PtmP : every case is supported (BRI/NT/PtmP is
> not in latest libpri, for instance)
> - routing seems very powerful.
>
>
> In the long run, I would preferably use telephony cards (or products)
> manufactered by companies directly contributing to Asterisk source
> code development (Digium, Xorcom, ...), and build telephony gateways
> with Asterisk, those telephony cards and off-the-shelf components, but
> I'm not sure conditions are met to do it now.
>
> That's why I'm also using Patton gateways at the moment and I think
> it's good to consider using them.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Giorgio
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_________________________________________________
Giorgio Incantalupo, mailto:gincantalupo at fgasoftware.com
FG&A srl - http://www.fgasoftware.com -
Voice at Work - The Agile PBX http://www.voiceatwork.eu
Tel: 02997663.14, Fax: 0291390172
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list