[asterisk-users] Question regarding SIP 183 "Session Progress" handling in Asterisk

[Philipp Kempgen]

Floimair Florian schrieb:
> I am having trouble with a project concerning the 183 Session Progress SIP messages. Asterisk seems to only accept these when there is also a Session Description (SDP) included in the message.
> 
> I also verified this by looking at the code.

Which version of Asterisk?

> However for a project we are working with a trunk to a third party system (Alcatel) and they are insisting that this behavior is non-compliant with RFC3261 (SIP). So can someone please tell me the reason,
> 
> why Asterisk does not support 183 messages without SDP as this would really help me finding arguments in this situation. So far Alcatel just tells us that this is not SIP-compliant and that we have to change things
> 
> on the Asterisk side, but I'm not quite sure that this is really the case and having arguments could help me clarifying this situation.

What they tell you might actually be correct. Not sure.

> Sip: f.floimair at commend.com <file:///T:\KAT\Signaturen\=%22sip:f.floimair@commend.com%22> 

Something went wrong here. JFYI.


    Philipp Kempgen
-- 
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied  ->  http://www.amooma.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998
Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.de
Videos of the AMOOCON VoIP conference 2009 ->  http://www.amoocon.de
--