[asterisk-users] IP phone recommendation
Christian Victor
christian at victormedia.de
Thu Jun 4 06:06:18 CDT 2009
Right! Whatever somebody likes more! I just say that the Snoms look
better at the side of my Mac. Wich is of course by far the superiour
system. ;-)
Chris
John Novack schrieb:
> Hasn't this religious argument/discussion gone on long enough??
>
>
> zoachien at securax.org wrote:
>
>> I personally find the snom phones to look quite good compared to the
>> american and chinese brands, might be a european thing though :)
>>
>> Zoa
>>
>>
>> Geraint Lee wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I personally find the snom phones to be generally ugly and
>>> "un-finger-friendly", in terms of reliability and quality, never had
>>> any trouble, good phones all in all, i just can't get past the tacky
>>> look and feel so don't buy them.
>>>
>>> 2009/6/3 Darrick Hartman <dhartman at djhsolutions.com
>>> <mailto:dhartman at djhsolutions.com>>
>>>
>>> On 06/03/2009 11:47 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Rob Hillis wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>>> >>> We are still talking about a $175 phone. How about the
>>> Polycom IP 320?
>>> >>> $85 at 888voipstore. Can't go wrong with Polycom for voice
>>> quality.
>>> >>>
>>> >> True, Polycom's are brilliant for voice quality, but unlike the
>>> Snom, a
>>> >> Polycom /will/ reboot on the drop of a hat /and/ take a damned
>>> long time
>>> >> to do it (~45-60 seconds) In addition, the web interface should be
>>> >> taken away and shot - the only real way to configure them is
>>> through (T)FTP.
>>> >>
>>> >> They are however, extraordinarily configurable through the XML
>>> config
>>> >> and they are very stable. Once they're configured they work very
>>> >> nicely. The lack of a decent number of BLF keys (even with a very
>>> >> expensive sidecar you only get two more keys than a standalone
>>> Snom320)
>>> >> puts me off a little.
>>> >>
>>> >> However, for a conference phone, the Polycom's can't be easily
>>> beaten.
>>> >> Their handsfree call quality is in a league of it's own.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Mainly I suggest it because the OP asked for an inexpensive
>>> quality phone.
>>> > I agree on the provisioning - the web interface is useless, and
>>> unless you
>>> > know how to setup the XML files properly you are doomed to a very
>>> > frustrating experience.
>>>
>>> The Polycom 320/330's are nice little phones for the price.
>>>
>>> There are several resources for configuring the phones from the XML
>>> config files. If the config files are sane, the phones don't take
>>> that
>>> long to reboot.
>>>
>>> This is probably one of the better examples:
>>>
>>> http://www.kfife.com/voip/
>>>
>>> Karl did a good job commenting in the config files where he made
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> Darrick
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>
>>> asterisk-users mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>
>>> asterisk-users mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4124 (20090602) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4124 (20090602) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list