[asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323

[Tony Mountifield]

In article <F43E89E805474ECDBDE144AF654E82E5 at BenderD>,
Dovid Bender <asteriskusers at dovid.net> wrote:
> Stay away form ooh323. It tends to crash Asterisk.

Much better to use it and fix any bugs that make Asterisk crash.
If everyone stays away from it, they will never get found and fixed.

IME, ooh323 is much leaner and cleaner than the other two H323
implementations, as it doesn't rely on external libraries of
specific versions, and doesn't have a load of C++ stuff to call
them.

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org