[asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323

[bilal ghayyad]

About h323 (not ooh323): 

I succeed to compile and now the h323 channel under asterisk contains file, look like it become avaibale.

Also I am now able to telnet the ip_address 1720 (which means the h323 port is listening).

Tonight did not get time to test, but tell me: what u were not able to make it work exactly? Which part?

Regards
Bilal


---------------- 
> Stay away form ooh323. It tends to crash Asterisk. If you
> get h323 let me 
> know. I was never able to get it working.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "bilal ghayyad" <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 19:20
> Subject: [asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323
> 
> 
> >
> > Hi All;
> >
> > To those who used H323, which u advise to use: h323
> that come with 
> > Asterisk or the ooh323? Why?
> >
> > Anyone can advise if still need gnugk for registration
> or I can register 
> > the h323 endpoint on asterisk without need for gnugk?
> >
> > Regards
> > Bilal