[asterisk-users] * as VM for legacy PBX?

Danny Nicholas danny at debsinc.com
Wed Jul 1 16:17:47 CDT 2009


The PBX would be FXS since it originates the calls, * would be FXO since it
only receives calls in this case.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ken D'Ambrosio
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] * as VM for legacy PBX?

Wow.  Thanks for all the replies!  Something just occurred to me, though:
which side would be FXO, and which side would be FXS?  The PBX?  Or the
Asterisk/VM side?

Thanks again for all the info!

-Ken


On Wed, July 1, 2009 3:36 pm, Jared Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 13:05 -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>
>> Sounds like good stuff, but my most substantial concerns involved
>> things like MWI: is asterisk able to "push" that back to the PBX?
>
> Does your existing PBX use SMDI to interface with your current voicemail
> system?  If so, recent versions of Asterisk (1.6.0 and later, if I recall)
> support SMDI.
>
>
> --
> Jared Smith
> Training Manager
> Digium, Inc.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
>
> asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list