No subject


Thu Jan 15 22:29:28 CST 2009


potentially starting to see problems... <br><br>FYI, not sure if it&#39;s o=
f use to you... but... The digium tc400b is a transcoder card that can offl=
oad upto 120 channels of transcoding for g729 &lt;-&gt; ulaw... It&#39;s av=
ailable as PCI only, but, if that&#39;s OK, it could be an alternative to r=
eplacing your server... G729 licenses are not needed when using that card..=
.<br>
<br>There have been posts by some people about having multiple CPU machines=
 but finding that asterisk&#39;s load wasn&#39;t spread over those CPUs ver=
y well... I&#39;m not sure if they had something special happening that cau=
sed their symptoms, but, from your dual core machine you should be able to =
see whether or not the load is already being spread across the 2 cores OK w=
ith your workload...<br>
<br>d<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/3/27 Mike <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:list at virtutel.ca">list at virtutel.ca</a>&gt;</span><br><b=
lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 20=
4, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Thanks that`s great info, and I&#39;ve already subscribed to the HA mailing=
<br>
list.<br>
<br>
I understand call handling takes little CPU, but half my calls are<br>
transcoded from ulaw to g729 and vice versa. =C2=A0That seems to take my si=
ngle<br>
CPU, dual-core 2.5Ghz machine up to ~35% CPU utilization. =C2=A0I imagine<b=
r>
doubling what happens on my server would take me dangerously close to the<b=
r>
upper limit of good call quality.<br>
<br>
Am I complete off?<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Mike<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<br>
&gt; From: <a href=3D"mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com">aster=
isk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com</a> [mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:asterisk-u=
sers-">asterisk-users-</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:bounces at lists.digium.com">bounces at lists.digium.com</=
a>] On Behalf Of David Backeberg<br>
&gt; Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 18:40<br>
&gt; To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br>
&gt; Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk multi-cpu<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Mike &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:list at virtu=
tel.ca">list at virtutel.ca</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; Hi,<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; I know somebody is going to give me the link to the wiki hardware=
 pages,<br>
&gt; but<br>
&gt; &gt; I can&#39;t find the answer there. I&#39;d like to know if, for a=
n Asterisk only<br>
&gt; &gt; system (nothing else of note running on it), I get a real gain fr=
om<br>
&gt; having 2<br>
&gt; &gt; CPUs.<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Does the amount of traffic/SIP registrations/codec translation po=
ssible<br>
&gt; &gt; doubles with 2 CPUs? (each quad core E5420 to be precise)? Does i=
t<br>
&gt; increase<br>
&gt; &gt; by 50%?=C2=A0 It is only a marginal increase, or none at all?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; You don&#39;t say anything about your possible kind of usage, so it&#3=
9;s<br>
&gt; difficult to provide any specific answer to your question. In general,=
<br>
&gt; a few things are true:<br>
&gt; * asterisk is multi-threaded<br>
&gt; * linux kernel has nice job schedulers and i/o schedulers<br>
&gt; * if you have more ram, more things will get cached in ram<br>
&gt; * if you have more cpus / cores you can do more things at once as long=
<br>
&gt; as they aren&#39;t all idle waiting for some resource constraint<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; You need to run a LOT of traffic through a server if it&#39;s just<br>
&gt; straight call handling, with a minimum of disk-bound i/o or<br>
&gt; transcoding, before you&#39;re going to max out modern hardware. So ju=
st<br>
&gt; buy the best server you want to buy, but save some money for a good<br=
>
&gt; warranty, or buy two servers if that&#39;s cheaper than what it would =
cost<br>
&gt; to be down.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If you want more in-depth discussions on this you probably would<br>
&gt; prefer the asterisk-ha-clustering list:<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ha-cluste=
ring" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-h=
a-clustering</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href=3D"http://www.api-digi=
tal.com" target=3D"_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; asterisk-users mailing list<br>
&gt; To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster=
isk-users" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster=
isk-users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href=3D"http://www.api-digital.c=
om" target=3D"_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users"=
 target=3D"_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<=
/a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--000e0cd332bcab0e390466125a60--



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list