[asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?
Jon Pounder
jonp at inline.net
Wed Jan 28 15:10:14 CST 2009
>
>
>> BRI is stupid in the US anyways, that is why it was never supported or
>> proper stack written (with the exception of Marcin's). BRI was a
>> miscarriage in the US and it will probably disappear in the near
>> future.
>>
>
> Okay, great! Why didn't you just reply with that to begin? Seriously...? '-)
>
> Look, this confirms what I'd pretty much concluded already. All I wanted to know. Now I can stop trying to find out what the deal is, you see.
>
> . . .
>
> Truly, I thought getting a public recommendation to contact someone who already hadn't passed the "please don't taint my GNU/Linux and open source" machine test, was, well, funny... okay?
>
> I found it *particularly* funny as you didn't address the part of my post where I want to know if it's common to, well... you can call it what you want with borrowing, and keeping modified, open source code (if that's what happened)... for me, I'm *not* a capitalist, but I do understand the effect on open source when folks do that. ;-)
>
>
>> Just get a partial PRI, POTS, or a some DSL lines.
>>
>
> Partial PRI is also disappearing, I've been told -- though now I'll have to try harder to find it since I don't need any bandwidth, but would like digital lines. POTS will likely have to do after all.
>
Well maybe if there was a decently supported piece of hardware that
actually worked in North America, enough people on this list would
actually see the benefits of BRI where T1/PRI is just not the right fit
for the situation, and there would be a demand and it would become more
well known and not disappear, .....
I agree though, if nothing changes it will go away before too long.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list