No subject

...

Thanks, anyway for telling as at least, it reflects your needs.

>
>
> You want NT PtMP and i second that,
>
not being limited on the asterisk
> side is a must in the
> telephony ecosystem, since the legacy PABX aren't alwsys easy to
> reconfigure.
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

--001636c5a501bedb5e0461636637
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/1/26 Benoit <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<=
a href=3D"mailto:maverick at maverick.eu.org">maverick at maverick.eu.org</a>&gt;=
</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px soli=
d rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Olivier a =E9crit :<br>
<div class=3D"Ih2E3d">&gt; Anyway, according your own experience, how frequ=
ent is this PTP case ?<br>
</div>I can&#39;t say, i don&#39;t have any other experience than our own l=
ines<br>
<div class=3D"Ih2E3d">&gt; That&#39;s the point : as much as possible, we&#=
39;re trying to avoid any<br>
&gt; re-configuration of legacy equipment.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; So, how would you order TE/NT, PtP/PtMP combination starting from the<=
br>
&gt; most useful (for yourself) to the least one.<br>
&gt; For instance, myself, I would classify them like this :<br>
&gt; 1. TE PtMP (the most needed)<br>
&gt; 2. NT PtMP<br>
&gt; 3. TE PtP<br>
&gt; 4. NT PtP (the least needed)<br>
<br>
</div>As for me it is<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;1. TE PtP<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;2. NT PtP<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;3. TE PtMP<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;4. NT PtMP<br>
<br>
At least until i encounter the need of a NT/TE PtMP setup.<br>
<br>
But i don&#39;t understand your point, NT/TE PtP and TE PtMP seem to be<br>
already implemented,<br>
i fail to see the use of classify them, since the only missing is NT PtMP</=
blockquote><div><br>The goal is to provide Matt and Digium with valuable in=
put as thinking &quot;a feature is needed&quot; is one thing, having severa=
l people asking for it is another story ...<br>
<br>From Matt&#39;s point of view NT PtMP was the least needed ... and so i=
s yours ...<br><br>Thanks, anyway for telling as at least, it reflects your=
 needs.<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1p=
x solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
You want NT PtMP and i second that,<br></blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt =
0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> not being limited on the asterisk<br>
side is a must in the<br>
telephony ecosystem, since the legacy PABX aren&#39;t alwsys easy to<br>
reconfigure.<br>
<div><div></div><div class=3D"Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href=3D"http://www.api-digital.c=
om" target=3D"_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
 &nbsp; <a href=3D"http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users"=
 target=3D"_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<=
/a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--001636c5a501bedb5e0461636637--