[asterisk-users] Which policy for ISDN BRI support in NT/PtMP ?

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> 2009/1/26 Stelios Koroneos <skoroneos at digital-opsis.com>
> 
> >
> > >
> > > So my opinion is that these NT-PTMP is really and urgently needed,
> > > especially if this TEI management is rather complex and therefore
> > > would take a long time to develop and stabilize.
> > > The alternative is to keep using those Patton, Quintum, etc ... boxes
> > > which is not what we would prefer ;-))
> > >
> >
> >
> > As a quick alternative look at zaphfc and friends, but don't expect it
> > to be "trouble-free".
> 
> 
> Excuse me but I'm not sure I'm getting it.
> 
> What I had in mind is :
> ISDN -----<BRI> ---- Asterisk with PCI board ----<BRI> --- Legacy PBX
> 
> For that, in countries where PTMP is the norm (is it ?) for small PBX (what
> is a small PBX, I don't know), you both need TE PTMP and NT PTMP. Options
> are Bristuff, mISDN, Dahdi (which now support BRI but NT PTMP is missing at
> this time)
> 
> Alternative is use a box that support those 2 modes such as :
> ISDN -----<BRI> ---- Patton box ----<BRI> --- Legacy PBX
>                                      |
>                                      |
>                                Asterisk
> 
> So, Stelios, what is the "zaphfc and friends" you were referring to ?
> By the way, do you mostly use TE PTMP or TE PTP ?

If you connect to another PBX, why would you use PTMP?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir