[asterisk-users] Zaptel -> DAHDI: now echo

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Dave Fullerton wrote:

> It is true that this method would require more configuration work and 
> that it would probably throw people off who were used to the old method. 
> However, I don't agree that it leaves more room for error. The current 
> system, IMHO, has a certain amount of ambiguity to it. If I inherit a 
> production system from someone, I can't tell for sure what the echo 
> canceller setup is just by looking at system.conf. I have to look at 
> system.conf and then know if hardware echo can is present. Aside from 
> opening the case or looking at dmesg output, I'm not even sure how to 
> see if a hardware echocan is present or not.

The dahdi_scan tool will tell you whether hardware echocans are present
or not, among other methods.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpfleming at digium.com
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org