[asterisk-users] New ViciDial Call Center Suite Release: 2.0.5

[ContactTel Business]

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rony Ron
Sent: April-09-09 11:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] New ViciDial Call Center Suite Release: 2.0.5

Great !
thank you very much for your job!
BR,

Matt Florell a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> We've released another update to our VICIDIAL/astGUIclient call center
> suite: 2.0.5
>
> http://astguiclient.sf.net/
>
> The call center suite client applications run on most modern web
> browsers on almost any GUI-capable operating system, and it includes
> the VICIDIAL call center suite.
> This package is free and AGPLv2.
> This package is geared towards Asterisk installations with SIP,IAX or
> Zap phones and Zaptel, IAX or SIP trunks.
>
> For this release, we have added hundreds of new features including
> Asterisk phone, trunk and DID configuration through the VICIDIAL web
> interface. We have also tested the suite on Asterisk versions through
> 1.2.30.2 and 1.4.21.2.
>
> All client web-apps and administration pages are available in English,
> Spanish, Greek, German, Italian and French, with rough translations of
> Polish, Portuguese, Brazillian Portuguese, Slovak, Russian and Dutch
> for the client web-apps only.
>
> Check out the project blog for more information:
> http://astguiclient.blogspot.com
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> MATT---
>
> _______________________________________________




Just ran into a problem with a cluster fu..k.. freepbx +vicidial+bad stuff..

Isn't that still broken as hell ? with like putting registrations in between
stanza's etc ?

Client added new trunk + routing into FPBX and it still used old routes
also..

Nice attempt, but from what i hear and see its same old pile of agi's and
scripts, making a single phone call ,,running over 2000 lines of stuff ,
where even the "see logs function" stops at 2000 lines.. ;) 

I really think the idea is nice, however, people trying to replicate the
functionality are probably running away as fast as they can when seeing the
extensive, undocumented code, is that intentional ? 

M