[asterisk-users] Require a Type 102 milliwatt number
John Novack
jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org
Tue May 27 20:40:18 CDT 2008
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> <snip>
>> Just another example of why the developers need to go to a basic Telco
>> school before reinventing the wheel ( sometimes incorrectly )
>>
>
> There is no need to insult the developers. Yes, there's a reason why the typical milliwatt application is not exactly 1000Hz. I think we've actually left the Milliwatt application the way that it is for historical reasons,ironically enough.
Not an insult.
No reason to be defensive either.
A very common problem in many fields of engineering is not being
educated in the history.
Learn about the past before attempting to be the future!
John Novack
--
Dog is my co-pilot
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list