[asterisk-users] Require a Type 102 milliwatt number

John Novack jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org
Tue May 27 20:40:18 CDT 2008



Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> <snip>
>> Just another example of why the developers need to go to a basic Telco
>> school before reinventing the wheel ( sometimes incorrectly )
>>     
>
> There is no need to insult the developers.  Yes, there's a reason why the typical milliwatt application is not exactly 1000Hz.  I think we've actually left the Milliwatt application the way that it is for historical reasons,ironically enough.
Not an insult.
No reason to be defensive either.
A very common problem in many fields of engineering is not being 
educated in the history.
Learn about the past before attempting to be the future!

John  Novack

-- 
Dog is my co-pilot




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list