[asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ?

[Sean Bright]

Yes, this is what I was referring to when I wrote it.

Benjamin Jacob wrote:
> The entire idea of using FastAGI is to relieve the Asterisk server of handling all the processing done by the AGI processes spawned by AGI/DeadAGI on the current server. With FastAGI, the business logic processing is supposed to be done on another server, thereby reducing load on the current one.
> 
> - Ben.
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 5/27/08, Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com>
>> Subject: [asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ?
>> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 9:28 AM
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here
>> (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+FastAGI),
>> you
>> can see :
>> "You will even see some improvement when converting
>> your existing AGIs into
>> FastAGIs and running them on the same server as your phone
>> system, though
>> this is not always feasible or recommended."
>>
>> Why "this is not always feasible or recommended"
>> ?
>> Shall I understand "it's worth to try but if the
>> burden is too heavy for a
>> single machine, be prepared to use two machines" ?
>>
>> Regards_______________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
>> http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Sean Bright
sean.bright at gmail.com