[asterisk-users] Performance issues

[Marcelo Freitas]

I'm not an expert, but FastAGI you use in a live channel over TCP connection ... Most people agree it is better because doesn't spawn a new process every time it is called ... but they also suggest to do not use in the same server ...
 
DeadAGI you cannot use it in a live channel ...
 
By the way, a2billing is a nice software ... Areski does a great job ... I neither use it a lot nor in a production high volume environment but I liked it ...





----- Original Message -----
Subject: [asterisk-users] Performance issues
From: "chetherston miles" >;miles.chet at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 10:20



Hello,


We are thinking in use asterisk-java to an billing solution, wich is the better choice, and if someone could give us a understandable description about the difference between DeadAGI and FastAGI, i found a very interesting project  called asterisk2billing and they use DeadAGI, anyway wich one scale better?


And there is a tool for test performance?


Thanks,
Roberto

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080506/9c83d4d9/attachment.htm