[asterisk-users] IAX issues with 1.4.19.1

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 13:23 +0100, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> Yes.

Hrm.  For those of us that are following along the AST-* train, patching
as per the AST-* release notices, as a matter of process, wouldn't it
have been good to republish AST-2008-006 and include this fix along with
the original patch?

IOW, IMHO, it should be standard practice that when you release a fix to
a patch in an AST-* security release, that you re-publish the security
notice complete with the original security fix and the security fix fix.

Some of us don't have the bandwidth to keep upgrading to
release-of-the-week or to watch every commit looking for both the
security fixes and the fixes to the security fixes.

Your consideration of this process enhancement would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanx,
b.

/me goes off to patch his * once again.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080506/bcb25770/attachment.pgp