[asterisk-users] Acceptance testing of a new PRI
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Sat Jul 26 14:32:34 CDT 2008
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 09:32:03PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Zap/2 here means the second Zap timeslot on the machine, as does
> > Zap/2-1, using all PRI's on Digium and Sangoma cards.
> >
> > I would have *expected* that it might behave the way you suggest, but
> > it appears not to. Unless it has something to do with the way my
> > zaptel presents the spans to Asterisk...
>
> Right. This is not supported. And you get there a warning:
>
> zt_request: Unknown option '-'
>
> As the '-' is parsed as a channel option (like 'r' or 'c').
>
> Time to fix voip-info.
Except that that is what Asterisk is giving *us*:
-- Local/8344 at demo-abb7,1 answered Zap/73-1
-- IAX2/VICIast26-19 answered Zap/73-1
-- Zap/11-1 is ringing
-- Zap/11-1 answered SIP/101cathy-0824cda0
As nearly as I can discern, those are messages where the Zap channel
ide is being generated by Asterisk, based on no particular
configuration we gave it (there are lots of others, but they could just
be repeating an argument they were passed; mostly Application
messages).
We do in fact, see that zt_request message, but it's not like we made
*up* the whole 73-1 thing... :-)
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Josef Stalin)
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list