[asterisk-users] OSLEC vs HPEC vs Octasic

[Loic Didelot]

Thank you for you answers.

So what tail would be suggested for 
SIP <-> LOCAL LAN <-> Asterisk <-> ISDN/BRI ?

Is HPEC more or less resource hungry compared to OSLEC?

Best regards,
Loic Didelot.


On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:54 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Gordon Henderson wrote:
> 
> > So at worst, it's saying it can handle 29 incarnations, and at best, 37 - 
> > that's assuming no other CPU load such as transcoding.
> > 
> > So it's well capable of handing your requirements of 16 channels - more-so 
> > if you're using a "server" class box, and not the "embedded" type systems 
> > I'm using here.
> > 
> > (On my dev box, an older 2GHz Celeron, 128KB cache, it's telling me it can 
> > do 120 incarnations, and on a 2.4GHz Xeon with 4MB cache, it said it could 
> > do 321)
> 
> Those numbers are with a 16ms tail, which is very short, and unlikely to
> be an adequate echo tail for connection to the PSTN (although fine for
> analog phones). A more normal configuration would be 32, 64 or 128
> millisecond tails, which would cut those numbers down by a factor of 2,
> 4 or 8.
> 
-- 
Loïc DIDELOT
MIXvoip S.a.
ldidelot at mixvoip.com
http://www.mixvoip.com