[asterisk-users] MagicJack quality

[C. Savinovich]

  Better handling of the packets, that's for sure.  Also, the algorithm is
smart, and flexible... that being said, it opens more questions than
answers.

CS


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael Graves
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 5:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MagicJack quality

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:13:15 -0400, C. Savinovich wrote:

>I am puzzled by the quality of magicjack.  I keep trying to figure out how
>they can the quality be that adequate.  Since Skype also has an excellent
>quality, that leaves me to believe that software based calls (softphones)
>could have and advantage over hardphones, provided there is a parameter
that
>those 2 companies are addressing.
>
>Anyone's thoughts on this?

More memory & CPU power then the average hard phone?

Michael
--
Michael Graves
mgraves<at>mstvp.com
http://blog.mgraves.org
o713-861-4005
c713-201-1262
sip:mjgraves at pixelpower.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
54245 at fwd.pulver.com



_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users