[asterisk-users] Performance issues

[Steve Totaro]

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Tilghman Lesher <
tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 09 July 2008 14:06:56 Thameem Ansari wrote:
> > There is no performance impact if you use AGI or DeadAGI.
>
> There is a performance impact, in terms of the time it takes for
> the process to start up.  It may be measured in fractions of a second,
> but there certainly is a performance penalty.  It is not zero.
>

Do you mean they both have the same penalty or is one worse than the other?


>
> > The only
> > difference is, if you use AGI it will not continue executing the dialplan
> > if the calling party hangsup the call. DeadAgi, will continue executing
> the
> > dialplan and its upto the applications responsibility to hangup the
> > channel. So, the application should be aggressive enough to hangup the
> > channel to avoid wrong cdr durations.
>
> DeadAGI is not recommended and is not supported for channels which are
> not already hungup (and invoked from the "h" extension in the dialplan).
>

Not recommended and not supported would imply it doesn't work.  I think it
works so who doesn't support it and why not?


>
> --
> Tilghman
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080709/c27464ff/attachment.htm