[asterisk-users] [asterisk-dev] Locking, coding guidelines addition

[Steve Totaro]

On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Michiel van Baak <michiel at vanbaak.info> wrote:
> On 14:26, Sat 05 Jul 08, Steve Totaro wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
>> <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote:
>> > On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
>> >> FreeSwitch will be the clear winner, or at least the heart of large
>> >> scale systems with a few Asterisk boxen here and there until it
>> >> becomes more mature.
>> >
>> > If you want to be a Freeswitch fanboy, that's fine, but please keep it off
>> > this list.  This list is for usage questions of Asterisk, not for fanboyism of
>> > other software projects.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tilghman
>> >
>>
>> Again, your ability to miss the point is astounding.  I never said I
>> was a Freeswitch fan boy.  I am just suggesting using a similar method
>> of locking with FreeSwitch.
>>
>> Ideas, obviously Digium doesn't care enough to listen to it's users.
>
> Why do you keep repeating this ?
> It's very clear that you totally dont like the way asterisk is run etc.
> Why dont
>
> --
>
> Michiel van Baak
> michiel at vanbaak.eu
> http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
> GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71C946BD
>
> "Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?"
>
>

Wrong again.  Asterisk does not, "annoys you so damn much"  I am just
pointing out the fact that  other systems have very few issues with
dealocks and a 10x performance increase because of that.

How does that mean, "you move away from asterisk if it annoys you so
damn much ?"  Why does using a product name hurt so muh?

Obviously this thread is going nowhere fast....

EOL