[asterisk-users] Nightly tarballs, would you use them?

[Matthew Rubenstein]

	I'd be even more likely to use nightly (or other periodic snapshot,
even weekly) .deb packages. Because then I could use APT to notify me
and manage them. Especially if they included a changelog (which APT
reports), even if that changelog were only names of files/modules
touched since the last one.


On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 12:00 -0600,
asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote:
> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:21:54 -0600
> From: Russell Bryant <russell at digium.com>
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Nightly tarballs, would you use them?
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>         <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <4791C132.5020607 at digium.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> During the past week, there have been some requests for nightly
> tarballs to help
> making testing new Asterisk code easier.  There was some debate as to
> whether
> they would be useful.  The reason that they may not be useful is
> because you can
> get equivalent access to new code just by accessing the subversion
> repository
> directly.  However, for one reason or another, some people would
> prefer to have
> a tarball.
> 
> If this was available, would you be interested in it?
> 
> If you just want to say "yes or no" for the sake of the poll, fell
> free to
> respond to me off-list.  However, also fell free to respond here if
> you have
> more verbose comments on the topic that you would like to share.
> 
> -- 
> Russell Bryant
-- 

(C) Matthew Rubenstein