[asterisk-users] 1.6, t.38 and zoiper - t38_udptl or t38pt_udptl ?
Steve Underwood
steveu at coppice.org
Wed Dec 3 05:42:55 CST 2008
Hi,
I would be interested in any reports of anyone getting a T.38 FAX to
send or receive successfully with Zoiper. I've tried to test my T.38
implementation against more than one revision of Zoiper, and I yet to
see it behave sanely.
Steve
Olivier wrote:
>
>
> 2008/12/3 regs at kinetix.gr <mailto:regs at kinetix.gr> <regs at kinetix.gr
> <mailto:regs at kinetix.gr>>
>
> I tried sending faxes through Zoiper (Zoiper to Zoiper) last week
> and the program crashed. After an update it stopped crashing but
> still could not send a FAX. I then tried Kapanga (the free version
> has a limited 30
> days FAX sending capability) and it worked. This might be of
> little use
>
>
> No it has much value to me.
>
> I was already suspicious about Zoiper as I could send fax between
> other endpoints.
>
> Originally, I thought using the same software on both could help to
> validate other settings (tuning of sip.conf) but to my surprise I
> couldn't find much about Zoiper fax capabilities.
> I have the rough feeling Zoiper can't receive fax at the moment or
> either, tuning Asterisk to allow that is not simple.
> For sending, I won't rate it at the moment.
>
>
>
> to you
> since I used Freeswitch with t38 pass-trhough, but my point is :
> first find a client
> that supports t38 FAX capabilites that work and then try asterisk.
> Our company had success
> sending FAX using t38 through asterisk along time ago so I guess
> you will get there sooner or later.
>
> Olivier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1. Has anyone got any success when send a TIFF file form one
>> zoiper softphone to another ?
>> I tried using Zoiper 2.18 free edition in windows but I'm seeing
>> 415 Unsupported media replies.
>>
>> 2. Here (http://www.voipinfo.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+T.38), you
>> can read :
>> "Also, try using:
>>
>> t38_udptl=yes
>> t38pt_rtp=no
>> t38pt_tcp=no
>>
>> ... in the general section of the sip.conf and under the VoIP
>> provider account as well as the fax account. "
>>
>> But above, you can read
>> "[general]
>> t38pt_udptl = yes "
>>
>> Has this parameter name changed between 1.4 to 1.6 from t38_udptl
>> to t38pt_udptl ?
>> A asterisk remains silent when I add an unknown parameter
>> "foo=bar", it would perfect if someone could point the right name
>> (t38_udptl or t38pt_udptl).
>>
>> Regards
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list