[asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Jean-Denis Girard
jd.girard at sysnux.pf
Tue Dec 2 18:26:40 CST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Todd a écrit :
> My results: The RealSpeak sample was more clear than the Cepstral.
> But by how much? I should probably test with more than just that one
> phrase, but I can't say I'd prefer RealSpeak significantly over
> Cepstral in this extremely limited case. Does RealSpeak get better
> long-term test results and comprehension/retention? I know that
> Cepstral is $50/port - the RealSpeak pricing is un-findable, which
> tells me that it's significantly higher than Cepstral. (Personal
> peeve: at least put your list pricing on the website! <grumble>)
For French language, I find the quality of RealSpeak to be very good.
Festival was unusable (for French); I tried Cepstral but was deceived.
The price of RealSpeak is not far from an order of magnitude higher
compared to Cepstral.
>
> That being said, I'd really be interested in hearing if anyone has
> done a RealSpeak-to-Asterisk conduit. I wasn't able to quickly
> uncover how they interact with third-party systems - is it VoIP? A C
> library? Some sort of HTTP socket? The more methods we can get
> working with Asterisk, the better, because not every implementation of
> a voice system has the same requirements...
That's a C library. I bought RealSpeak SDK, and developed app_realspeak
for Asterisk (1.2, then ported to 1.4). I've been using it since 2005
for my IVR projects, including telcos/banks/airlines :)
Regards,
- --
Jean-Denis Girard
SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française
http://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 50 10 40 / GSM: +689 79 75 27
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEARECAAYFAkk10kAACgkQuu7Rv+oOo/gK2ACfXedtJ8k7cmVRpOqTU+rYpbVy
PcIAnjbXbDPuicE29673TQY3CritOksQ
=vvB7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list