[asterisk-users] Paging for analoge devices
Steve Totaro
stotaro at totarotechnologies.com
Mon Apr 28 14:10:06 CDT 2008
Bilal,
So you want to page through your analog phones, no overhead paging. I
doubt this is possible.
I think your options are an IP phones such as the Polycom that
supports paging or using an AMP and speakers usually mounted high on
the wall or flush with a tile ceiling.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:58 AM, bilal ghayyad <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Steve;
>
> Already we need to use the same analoge phones that is
> connected to the fxs ports, to do paging to it.
>
> What overhead?
>
>
>
> Regards
> Bilal
> --- Steve Totaro <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Bilal,
> >
> > You will have great luck with Polycom then, not sure
> > about others.
> > Why not go for overhead paging? It will be much
> > easier.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Totaro
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:24 AM, bilal ghayyad
> > <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > And auto answer also will be needed for IP Phones?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Bilal
> > > --- Steve Totaro <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bilal,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to reply to my reply but if you can
> > register
> > > > multiple accounts
> > > > and setup auto answer on one of those accounts,
> > it
> > > > could work. The
> > > > problem is, I am not sure if there are any ATAs
> > that
> > > > have this
> > > > ability.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Steve Totaro
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Steve Totaro
> > > > <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com> wrote:
> > > > > Bilal,
> > > > >
> > > > > No, I do not think that you can make this
> > work.
> > > > You would obviously
> > > > > need auto answer or how else would the audio
> > come
> > > > out of the speakers?
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought you were talking about overhead
> > paging.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Steve Totaro
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:49 AM, bilal
> > ghayyad
> > > > <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Steve;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was asking about the ability to do
> > paging on
> > > > the
> > > > > > normal analoge phones (which is connected
> > to
> > > > fxs
> > > > > > ports, and it already receive and
> > originate
> > > > calls on
> > > > > > the system). So does that work? If yes,
> > do I
> > > > need
> > > > > > auto-answer? If I need auto-answer here,
> > then
> > > > I will
> > > > > > face a problem in the calls which coming
> > > > normally to
> > > > > > the analoge phone (when someone dial that
> > > > extension).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any advise?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > Bilal
> > > > > > --- Steve Totaro
> > > > <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bogen is the defacto standard in
> > quality
> > > > paging
> > > > > > > equipment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > FXS port should work just fine with
> > > > auto-answer
> > > > > > > using any AMP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Onkyo suggestion was just an idea
> > for a
> > > > cheaper
> > > > > > > but probably
> > > > > > > higher quality audio with more volume
> > in a
> > > > loud
> > > > > > > environment. I was
> > > > > > > not saying you "needed" to use Onkyo,
> > just
> > > > that you
> > > > > > > could build a
> > > > > > > paging system with a regular tuner,
> > possibly
> > > > have
> > > > > > > better sound, and do
> > > > > > > it cheaper than going Bogen.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Steve Totaro
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:39 AM, bilal
> > > > ghayyad
> > > > > > > <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi All;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just would like to know if Boger,
> > UPAM,
> > > > and Onkyo
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > be connected to the FXS ports and
> > take
> > > > extension
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > asterisk?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And why Onkyo is needed if I need to
> > use
> > > > horn
> > > > > > > > speakers?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > Bilal
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > bilal ghayyad wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Steve Totaro wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/5/08, bilal ghayyad
> > > > > > > > <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone knows (tried) to
> > use
> > > > Page for
> > > > > > > > analoge
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > phone(zaptel channel -
> > > > fxs)? If
> > > > > > > yes,
> > > > > > > > how?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bogen Rulez
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry I did not understand
> > any
> > > > thing
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > reply.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Google is your friend. I
> > > > discovered very
> > > > > > > > quickly what
> > > > > > > > they were
> > > > > > > > talking
> > > > > > > > > > > about by googling.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You may be able to find the
> > device
> > > > a little
> > > > > > > > cheaper, but
> > > > > > > > without
> > > > > > > > the brand
> > > > > > > > > > name, by searching for "UPAM".
> > > > Typically,
> > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > will have
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > "AT&T" or
> > > > > > > > > > "Lucent" names branded on
> > them,
> > > > despite
> > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > identical and
> > > > > > > > > > manufactured by exactly the
> > same
> > > > entity.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> >
>
>
> === message truncated ===
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list