[asterisk-users] Digium B410P or Sangoma A502D?
Patrick
asterisk-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl
Fri Apr 25 06:37:15 CDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 20:17 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> The Sangoma kernel drivers are different than Zaptel, while running
> the install script you are asked if you would like to generate the
> Zaptel configs but it is not required, you must also run wancfg to
> configure the cards beyond the Zaptel configs. The Sangoma drivers
> kind of run on top of the Zaptel.
Thanks for clearing that up. That's what I thought too.
> It seems that the newest wanpipe drivers and Zaptel 1.4 work without
> the D chan patch which is very nice IMO, I hate patches.
That's good to hear. The less patches the better.
> I have run
> the BRIStuff install and it has tons of patches! Kind of scary but it
> works for it's purpose.
Yesterday I had to update a set of 1.2 Asterisk RPMs with the latest
Junghanns patch. So I downloaded the latest Junghanns patch and had a
look. Wow, that's a serious set of patches to zaptel, libpri and
asterisk. Kind of scary indeed.
> I have only done BRI once but there was absolutely no echo by simply
> setting echocancel=yes, echocancelwhenbridged=no.
Personally I use an Eicon Diva Server card with onboard echo can in my *
box and calls to cellphones can still generate a ton of echo. Same
applies to calls to POTS phones that are hooked up to copper that's in a
rather bad state or use a €5 phone.
> I hear "might as well get the hardware EC board" quite a bit, but on
> all the many dozens of PRIs I have installed, software EC has been
> adequate (if needed at all). It would have meant quite a bit of
> wasted money that was better spent on a nice 48 port gigabit switch.
Lucky you :) Or your upstream telco has deployed some serious echo can
boxes throughout its network doing echo cancellation already for you.
> I have tested both ways (hardware vs. software), no difference really
> (Sangoma). Sangoma actually sent me one of each before purchasing
> seven quad cards to test if hardware EC was going to be required for
> one deployment. I returned the hardware EC card and ordered seven
> quad PRI cards.
>
> Maybe I am just lucky or have not had enough exposure to BRI but ISDN
> is ISDN, right (it really is a question, I don't know)?
EuroISDN is EuroISDN. Doesn't matter if it's BRI or PRI.
> Now on
> analog, that is a horse of a different color, also the phone on
> either side, but especially your side can be the culprit (older
> Grandstream for one) Polycom seems to eliminate much of this.
Point well taken. You get what you pay for.
Regards,
Patrick
> Thanks,
> Steve Totaro
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Matt Watson <mwatson at becon.org>
> wrote:
> > I haven;t used any BRI cards but... call me crazy but wouldn;t they
> still be using Zaptel (even your sangoma... the script might just be
> configuring it for you)...
> >
> > and btw, software echo cancel happens in the zaptel kernel
> driver... it has nothing to do with the hardware (hence why its a
> software echo cancel)....
> >
> > You also would of had the option of buying HPEC licenses for
> software echo cancel from digium for a rather cheap price.
> >
> > --
> > Matt
> > ________________________________________
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andres
> [andres at telesip.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:04 PM
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Digium B410P or Sangoma A502D?
> >
> >
> >
> > We have tested both and they work fine. The Sangoma is much easier
> to
> > install as it does not depend on any other driver, you just run
> > 'setup-sangoma' and follow the instructions. You don't have to
> fiddle
> > with the linux kernel or zaptel or chan_misdn. It just works.
> Plus
> > its more modular. You can chose 2/4/6 ports to buy and if you need
> more
> > just add remoras up to 24 ports. The Digium card is fixed to 4
> ports,
> > period.
> >
> > Having said that, make sure you stick with the version that has
> hardware
> > echo cancel and not even try the other one. We made the mistake of
> > buying the first time without echo cancel expecting to test the
> > 'software echo cancel'. But there is no such thing as 'software
> echo
> > cancel' on this card. I do not even understand why Sangoma would
> make a
> > version without the hardware echo cancel. You get some degree of
> echo
> > on practically every call.
> >
> > Andres.
> >
> >
> >
> > Patrick wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I need to setup an Asterisk box with 4x ISDN BRI links. Looking at
> the
> > >specs of various cards I favor the Digium B410P and Sangoma A502D
> > >because of hardware echo cancellation. Does anyone have any
> experience
> > >with either card, good or bad? Which one would you choose and why?
> > >
> > >Thanks for your insight.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Patrick
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list