[asterisk-users] Chanspy on Asterisk 1.4.19

Sean Bright sean.bright at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 13:45:40 CDT 2008


Ah.  My apologies for the confusion.  Not that it helps you a great 
deal, but I am running ChanSpy successfully in production (as we speak) 
with 1.4.19 with no crashes or the like:

	ChanSpy(SIP/11,g(Spyable))

Maybe its only a problem if no channel spec is passed?

Steve Rawlings wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Sean Bright wrote:
>> Steve Totaro wrote:
>>
>>> Should one have to change their dialplan for functionality to remain
>>> the same in the same version?
>> I wasn't suggesting it wasn't a regression, just making the OP aware 
>> that he can pass multiple arguments to a dialplan application (i.e. 
>> ChanSpy(|bg(2000)))
>>
>> He mentioned that he was able to get it to work in 1.4.19 by passing the 
>> bridge argument ('b') but didn't seem to be aware that he could also 
>> pass his original argument list ('g(2000)') as well.  Seems easier to 
>> just work around the problem with the additional argument than to 
>> backport the application.
>>
> 
> Yes I was aware of multiple arguments, I did try chanspy(|bg(2000)), I 
> tried all combinations I could think of.  Although maybe what I should 
> have said was I tried chanspy(|b) just to prove chanspy itself was 
> working at all (and it was), with chanspy(|bg(2000)) the 'spygroup' 
> element didn't work, it just spied on every active call.
> 
> Anyway, I've raised a bug report as requested by Jared at Digium.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Sean Bright
sean.bright at gmail.com



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list