[asterisk-users] Chanspy on Asterisk 1.4.19
Sean Bright
sean.bright at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 13:45:40 CDT 2008
Ah. My apologies for the confusion. Not that it helps you a great
deal, but I am running ChanSpy successfully in production (as we speak)
with 1.4.19 with no crashes or the like:
ChanSpy(SIP/11,g(Spyable))
Maybe its only a problem if no channel spec is passed?
Steve Rawlings wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Sean Bright wrote:
>> Steve Totaro wrote:
>>
>>> Should one have to change their dialplan for functionality to remain
>>> the same in the same version?
>> I wasn't suggesting it wasn't a regression, just making the OP aware
>> that he can pass multiple arguments to a dialplan application (i.e.
>> ChanSpy(|bg(2000)))
>>
>> He mentioned that he was able to get it to work in 1.4.19 by passing the
>> bridge argument ('b') but didn't seem to be aware that he could also
>> pass his original argument list ('g(2000)') as well. Seems easier to
>> just work around the problem with the additional argument than to
>> backport the application.
>>
>
> Yes I was aware of multiple arguments, I did try chanspy(|bg(2000)), I
> tried all combinations I could think of. Although maybe what I should
> have said was I tried chanspy(|b) just to prove chanspy itself was
> working at all (and it was), with chanspy(|bg(2000)) the 'spygroup'
> element didn't work, it just spied on every active call.
>
> Anyway, I've raised a bug report as requested by Jared at Digium.
>
> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Sean Bright
sean.bright at gmail.com
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list