[asterisk-users] QOS for outgoing SIP ... Who needs QoS anyway!

[J. Oquendo]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Brian J. Murrell wrote:

| I think I've made it clear that my argument is only about uplink shaping
| and the requirement for it given the asymmetric nature of a lot of last
| mile connections existing today.  Funny enough that is *exactly* what
| the OP was asking about.
|
| b.

Answers the question with minimal relevance, not even a band-aid
solution. You fixing up inbound traffic will do nothing for a horrible
conversation if you're congested coming in. Solution would be to add
more bandwidth. Else you could fiddle around around creating all the
fuzzy rules on the planet shaping traffic all sorts of methods once its
in your CPE but this WILL NOT HELP YOU HAVE A BETTER CONVERSATION. When
it does, when someone can realistically point this out please let me
know so I can switch from a DS3 to T1 and save money.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQIVAwUBSAdXC4OeOV2sx4+mAQIVFw/+NttSjlj132/ikQZN4pI6kJJH49GxJiMp
aA9ugBu0jA9ZXSgU8oHw9ZbgkZfjalM1vtmekOW+w4eXUwlx82jEGEJ1e7iBT30e
wB9cOOMlpn1+sFrZxesAz/8a7ziFC02Ydf2+V3j8FfPga8DuHWtF/hubm7p/d3Zy
Km1Vm1ruajCTM9PAvVO/Jj2TybzYwWj7Pj2TzwZEsYCXUuj5/E0fnQjJKCI4q6e6
UHsOs5tpqedzRCSJ2Zv96xkHAFWDLOUke2vXp20ZETnOxqOVtULm+EuYXsHvauYN
6sMZf7Tq04+jMrbR1GWLCevvEoJN1XpTEOBb3yv7S/7U7Ih/mQfluHNj4hVUACYs
vFlIJyHBeLxeAOH5VFm66SDtIQ2TKGLuFblDD5E6MmhXYdhwdwsmGecfaEJHR/+K
83CDQ1P1tDtN6JjcYXsoN8125uRKYH2EQunfZq01GJQlj6QNJcZHcv9FrRYXan42
7yxB+h1UpgNLMAthOQsQ8+nt7rRD8v0GlPZBwXlRF1n2S2jAVJiwlrihfiW5xA6C
LsRuU7GIo/XkX/zNQk2BIGszziIEGcYaJjYnXBdsP2QN6IwkCz8xwQbgtssSMqmd
kbFelVI4BepzbG2lUVkmUAavoFL7T1c9eIyMU9vunOJtP/azTadXP9ITS936mKYK
pYOvun1cnqU=
=I0yU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----