[asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?
Matthew Fredrickson
creslin at digium.com
Wed Apr 16 10:20:12 CDT 2008
Ex Vito wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Matthew Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote:
>> The softlockup indicator should be benign. It gets called when loaded
>> the firmware for the part since the firmware image is so large and it
>> takes a long time to load. However, I might have a fix for you.
>>
>> Can you try my stack reduction branch at:
>>
>> https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/team/mattf/zaptel-1.4-stackcleanup
>>
>> If that does not work, please contact me directly and I will work with
>> you to get a resolution.
>>
>
> Matt,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. We've already tested the following
> branch as per Shaun's suggestion, without getting a different
> behaviour (see today's earlier email to the list):
>
> http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel/team/mattf/zaptel-1.4-stackcleanup/
>
> Question:
>
> - The url you suggest is very similar, are we talking about
> a different "stackcleanup" branch ?
>
> We are now in the middle of rebuilding a non 4K stack page
> kernel so as to give it a try with 1.4.10, the branch Shaun
> suggested, 1.4.9.2 and the branch you mention, if it is in fact
> different from Shaun's.
>
> We wait your confirmation and will post non 4K stack kernel
> results later today.
One thing also I would like to see is your kernel .config file. Another
thing that would for sure remove that warning is to disable the kernel
softlockup detector which is giving a false lockup warning in this case.
I belive it's under the "KERNEL HACKING" configuration menu if you are
using menuconfig.
--
Matthew Fredrickson
Software/Firmware Engineer
Digium, Inc.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list