[asterisk-users] question about queue

[Matt King]

Two use-cases where autofill=no is desirable:

1)  If it's important that you answer your callers in strict order (i.e. 
in order to meet estimated wait time commitments etc).

2)  If your queue members/agents are local channels (as local channels 
are always available, so call attempts will be made regardless of who's 
talking).

Kind regards,

    Matt.

BJ wrote

>/   This was something I put in a long while back on 1.2 branch because we really needed it for 1.2 
>   to "bug fix" the behavior, but also needed to prevent the change in behavior for those that 
>   didn't want it to change.
/>/
/>/   That being the case and we're in the day and age of 1.6 branches now, it'd be interesting to 
>   think of what people would think of deprecating this option completely now in /trunk in favor 
>   of the "autofill=yes" behavior being the only behavior available. I cannot think of any use 
>   cases where the autofill=no behavior might be desirable. That being said, I also might have 
>   blinders on so would be curious to here what the rest of the community has to say about it.
/>/
/>/   BJ/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080415/cc532d83/attachment.htm