[asterisk-users] Which cause less CPU usage: GSM or wav??

[Barton Fisher]

Thanks, OK, a bit confused....  The cards are TE410P.  I really don't 
see how the set a codec for this, other than it might default to 
something in code like ulaw.  Any clue on how to verify codec in use 
during a call?

Bart

Steve Totaro wrote:
> Michiel van Baak wrote:
>   
>> On 10:28, Sun 09 Sep 07, Barton Fisher wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I have 4 TDM T1's going in to a IVR system.  The IVR messages are 
>>> recorded .wav format - The system appears to crap out at about 40 calls 
>>> - Would using GSM or some other format help save CPU cycles?
>>> Using 1.2, Dual Xeon and 2GB ram
>>>     
>>>       
>> depends on what codec the T1 is using.
>> Best to transcode the ivr sounds to the same codec to
>> prevent on-the-fly transcoding by asterisk.
>>
>>   
>>     
> The answer is going to ulaw or alaw depending where you live.  T1 should 
> most likely be using ulaw so make everything ulaw, end to end.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Totaro
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 
>
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2516 (20070909) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>   

-- 

Barton Fisher
Innovative Communications
714-228-5400 Ext 5410
http://www.icpage.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bart.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 231 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070909/8e0ee35b/attachment.vcf