[asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL
Anthony Francis
anthonyf at rockynet.com
Wed Oct 3 09:11:46 CDT 2007
Lee Jenkins wrote:
> Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
>> examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
>> dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need
>> IFs.
>>
>> Why most people don't use it? Am I missing something?
>>
>>
>
> I just think its the default so probably many new people to Asterisk
> start there and then possibly move over to AEL or AGI scripts later on
> as needs become more complex... For those that have been in the
> Asterisk community for a longer period of time, the traditional "flat
> line" script was all that was available until AEL came along as far as I
> know.
>
> I wrote an automated dialplan generator so much of *our* systems had the
> traditional flat script because its much easier to produce that
> traditional asterisk script from a GUI that generates script for you.
>
> I prefer pascal syntax personally, so we use a pascal based AGI/FastAGI
> engine that I wrote for much of our more advanced logic.
>
> In the end, it probably comes down to preference and need, I would
> think. Nice to be proficient in writing it all; flat scripts, AEL,
> AGI/FastAGI/Manager API (using your programming/script language of
> prefernce)....this way we can have more tools to solve more problems for
> our customers or company.
>
>
>
> ---
> Warm Regards,
>
> Lee
>
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
--
Thank you and have a wonderful day,
Anthony Francis
Rockynet VOIP
(303) 444-7052 opt 2
voip at rockynet.com
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list