[asterisk-users] 1.4 SIP Jitter Buffer
Mehdi chouikh
cmedii at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 13:19:16 CST 2007
I have asterisk 1.4.14 in 3 of my 8 servers for 3 weeks on productions
systems, but i had problem with adapative jitter buffer, when i active
it there are no sound.
Regards
On Nov 6, 2007 9:16 PM, Gregory Boehnlein <damin at nacs.net> wrote:
> Are you running the SIP Jitter Buffer?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Luc Moreira
> > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:44 PM
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4 SIP Jitter Buffer
> >
> > Gregory
> >
> > We have many Asterisk 1.4.13 in production solid like a rock.
> >
> > Couples examples:
> > a) Asterisk 1.4.13 + Unicall + 2 E1 MFCR2 Digium + Legacy PBX
> > 60+ Extentions / IVR / 10~30 concorrent calls
> >
> > b) Asterisk 1.4.11 + 1 E1 ISDN PRI Digium
> > 50+ Extentions / IVR / 5 Queues / ~2000 call/day
> >
> > c) Asterisk 1.4.13 + 4 E1 ISDN Digium (working in progress)
> > CallCenter / 150 PAs / 15 Queues / expected 8000 calls/day
> >
> > --
> > Luc
> >
> > Gregory Boehnlein escreveu:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm running into a few situations on lossy network links where a
> > SIP
> > > jitter buffer w/ some PLC would be helpful. My main TDM gateways are
> > running
> > > 1.2 (which is solid, stable, reliable and very very very well behaved
> > when
> > > you know it's limitations), but I'm considering upgrading them before
> > the
> > > end of the year to 1.4. Two of the main reasons that I would do this
> > are
> > > Variable Length DTMF and SIP Jitter Buffering. I would be very
> > interested in
> > > hearing from anyone that is actually running 1.4 in a PRODUCTION
> > > environment, gatewaying SIP to TDM using Digium cards. To me,
> > production
> > > means being able to have 3-4 PRI circuits maxed out for 12+ hours a
> > day and
> > > 7+ call setups / second. Anything less than that is not really going
> > to be
> > > an accurate comparison to what I have running.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any feedback about this combination?
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by N2Net Mailshield, and is
> > believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list