[asterisk-users] *End Of Life ASTERISK 1.2.X THEN AMP IS DEAD TOO!

shadowym shadowym at hotmail.com
Wed May 30 14:16:47 MST 2007


If anything this should "motivate" the FreePBX developers a bit more. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Smith [mailto:jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:47 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] *End Of Life ASTERISK 1.2.X THEN AMP IS DEAD
TOO!

On 5/30/07, BSumrall <Brads at ftnco.com> wrote:
> AMP does not support 1.4 and will not until AMP 2.3 is released!

I'm sorry to hear you think our decision (I say "our", as I was at the
Asterisk Developers' Conference where the decision was made) will kill the
AMP project.  Personally, I don't think the situation is as dire as you say.
I'm quite sure the AMP developers will step up to the plate and support
Asterisk 1.4 in due time.  When that will be I can't say, as I'm not active
in the AMP community. I can't image it would take that long to move over to
Asterisk 1.4, as the dialplan changes aren't *that* extensive between 1.2
and 1.4. (Obviously any code that ties into the internal C APIs of Asterisk
will take longer to port.)

> Bet you guys didn't think about that one!

Actually, we did.  As a matter of fact, I was *very* vocal at the conference
in stating that we needed to give users, integrators, and projects like AMP
a substantial warning before putting Asterisk 1.2 in security maintenance
mode, as they need time to react.

At the same time, I don't think anyone should expect the Asterisk developers
to base all their decisions completely on the timetables of outside projects
(like AMP).  There is a plethora of projects and programs out there that tie
into Asterisk, and if we as developers waited for every single one to move
over to Asterisk 1.4, we'd never accomplish anything.  There's simply a
finite set of resources (developers and bug marshalls in this case), and a
decision had to be made on how best to use those resources.  Personally, I
think it would be great if there were more communication between the outside
projects and the Asterisk developers, so that there isn't so much animosity
when decisions like this are made.

In short, the decision is probably going to cause some short-term discomfort
for some people, but I truly believe it's a good decision for the long-term
health and sanity of the Asterisk developers and Asterisk community in
general.  No, we're not trying to kill off AMP or any other outside project
-- we're trying to make Asterisk (and by extension, anything that uses or
adds on to Asterisk) as great as possible.

-Jared




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list