[asterisk-users] Re: DUNDi configuration problem

[Remco Post]

Tim Verscheure wrote:
> Does this even work?
> 
> exten => 5010,1,Dial(SIP/5010 at priv)
> 

if priv is a sip account it does.... Yes, I guess you are on the right
track.

> It keeps saying CHANUNAVAIL...
> 
> 
> greetz
> 
> 2007/5/22, Tim Verscheure <tverscheure at gmail.com>:
>> ok so now I changed "ext-local" to "dundi-ext" and I created this
>> context at the bottom of the extensions file. This is now the case.
>>
>> [dundi-priv-canonical]
>> ; Direct numbers
>>
>> exten => 5010,1,NooP(DUNDI LOOKUP 5010)
>> exten => 5011,1,NooP(DUNDI LOOKUP 5011)
>>
>> exten => _60XX,1,Goto(dundi-ext,${EXTEN},1)
>>
>> [dundi-priv-customers]
>> ; If you are an ITSP or Reseller, list your customers here.
>> exten => _60XX,1,Goto(dundi-ext,${EXTEN},1)
>>
>> [dundi-priv-via-pstn]
>> ; If you are freely delivering calls to the PSTN, list them here
>>
>> [dundi-priv-local]
>> include => dundi-priv-canonical
>> include => dundi-priv-customers
>> include => dundi-priv-via-pstn
>>
>> exten => 5010,1,Dial(SIP/5010)
>> exten => 5011,1,Dial(SIP/5011)
>>
>> [dundi-priv-switch]
>> ; Just a wrapper for the switch
>> switch => DUNDi/priv
>>
>> [dundi-priv-lookup]
>> include => dundi-priv-local
>> include => dundi-priv-switch
>>
>> [macro-dundi-priv]
>> exten => s,1,Goto(${ARG1},1)
>> include => dundi-priv-lookup
>>
>> [trydundi]
>> exten => _.,1,Macro(dundi-priv,${EXTEN})
>> exten => _.,2,Congestion
>>
>>
>> This is the dundi-ext at the bottom. In there I put this line:
>> [dundi-ext]
>> exten => _60XX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@priv)
>>
>> I made this myself, I think that if I get an incoming call from for
>> example 6010, the person would be dialing SIP/6000 at priv, right?
>>
>> this is the output:
>> *CLI>     -- Executing [5011 at default:1] Goto("SIP/6010-0820cdc8",
>> "dundi-ext|5011|1") in new stack
>>     -- Goto (dundi-ext,5011,1)
>>     -- Executing [5011 at dundi-ext:1] Dial("SIP/6010-0820cdc8",
>> "SIP/5011 at priv") in new stack
>> [May 22 14:36:18] WARNING[4520]: chan_sip.c:2738 create_addr: No such
>> host: priv
>> [May 22 14:36:18] WARNING[4520]: app_dial.c:1099 dial_exec_full:
>> Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 3 - No route to
>> destination)
>>   == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
>>   == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/6010-0820cdc8' status is
>> 'CHANUNAVAIL'
>>
>>
>> 2007/5/21, Remco Post <remco at pipsworld.nl>:
>> > Tim Verscheure wrote:
>> > > Now I get this... If I call from 5011 on the 192.168.1.103 machine to
>> > > 6010 on the 192.168.1.69 machine my X-lite softphone says, call
>> > > declined
>> > >
>> > > this is the output:
>> > >    -- Executing [6010 at default:1] Goto("SIP/5011-081da508",
>> > > "ext-local|6010|1") in new stack
>> > >    -- Goto (ext-local,6010,1)
>> > > [May 21 15:32:46] WARNING[8939]: pbx.c:2450 __ast_pbx_run: Channel
>> > > 'SIP/5011-081da508' sent into invalid extension '6010' in context
>> > > 'ext-local', but no invalid handler
>> > >
>> >
>> > so, is there an extension 6010 in you context ext-local? Probably
>> not ;-)
>> >
>> > > I'll add my extension file so you can see it. greetz
>>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten                      http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 3000    Fax. +31 20 668 3167
PGP Key fingerprint = 6367 DFE9 5CBC 0737 7D16  B3F6 048A 02BF DC93 94EC

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the
computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the
computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to
end." -- Douglas Adams