[asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability

[Dean Collins]

Do you have any specific experience with astmanproxy?

Can anyone give me an idea on number of simultaneous connections this
can legitimately handle with ease?

This has been around for a while by the looks of it but I haven't heard
about it before.

 

Regards,

Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
dean at cognation.net
+1-212-203-4357 Ph
+1-917-207-3420 Mb
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Martin Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 1:09 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
> 
> You guys all sound like you're talking about AstManProxy.
> 
> See:
> http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=AstManProxy
> 
> 
> I'm not saying it is the solution to your problem per se, but I can't
> help but think of it when I read the descriptions of what people want
> (you even use the word proxy!). Figured I'd send this out in case
> someone hadn't seen it.
> 
> Martin Smith, Systems Developer
> martins at bebr.ufl.edu
> Bureau of Economic and Business Research
> University of Florida
> (352) 392-0171 Ext. 221
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> > Lee Jenkins
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
> >
> > > The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step
> > where sending of
> > > Actions does not require an actual Telnet conneciton to the
> > AMI, but I
> > > think to be able to handle larger numbers of concurrent
> > connections that
> > > a separate send-only and a separate receive-only type of
> > interface be
> > > built where Asterisk would just output all AMI data to a single
> > > server-like application that would then broadcast it to all
> > connected
> > > clients. This would remove the burden of so many connections going
> > > directly into Asterisk and would allow for much larger scaling of
> > > AMI-type applications that require real-time output of AMI events.
> > >
> >
> > I definitely agree here personally.  Clients could connect to this
> > "proxy" and subscribe to only the events that are interesting
> > or applicable.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users