[asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability

[Martin Smith]

You guys all sound like you're talking about AstManProxy.

See:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=AstManProxy


I'm not saying it is the solution to your problem per se, but I can't
help but think of it when I read the descriptions of what people want
(you even use the word proxy!). Figured I'd send this out in case
someone hadn't seen it.

Martin Smith, Systems Developer
martins at bebr.ufl.edu
Bureau of Economic and Business Research
University of Florida
(352) 392-0171 Ext. 221 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com 
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
> Lee Jenkins
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
> 
> > The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step 
> where sending of 
> > Actions does not require an actual Telnet conneciton to the 
> AMI, but I 
> > think to be able to handle larger numbers of concurrent 
> connections that 
> > a separate send-only and a separate receive-only type of 
> interface be 
> > built where Asterisk would just output all AMI data to a single 
> > server-like application that would then broadcast it to all 
> connected 
> > clients. This would remove the burden of so many connections going 
> > directly into Asterisk and would allow for much larger scaling of 
> > AMI-type applications that require real-time output of AMI events.
> >
> 
> I definitely agree here personally.  Clients could connect to this 
> "proxy" and subscribe to only the events that are interesting 
> or applicable.
>