[asterisk-users] really strange behavior

[Tom Lynn]

exten => _X.,1,

On 6/3/07, BSumrall <Brads at ftnco.com> wrote:
>
> Understood, it is not the "catch all" but, what if I am designing a server
> that needs to accept calls from 15 or more 1800 numbers?
>
> How would you now channel it to a "catch all"?
>
> Brad
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of randulo
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 4:55 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] really strange behavior
>
> >  In short, the 's' extension is not a catch-all.
>
> The use of 's' can be confusing. The best example I have of the use of
> 's' is when a ZAP call comes in on an analog line. IIRC, the book says
> something to the effect that 's' is for when, upon arrival in a
> context, the call has no other place to go. Works for me :)
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070603/f3d4cd4a/attachment.htm