[asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*

[Justin at lach.net]

Snom's do 729 just fine 190,320,360 all have worked well for us
>
> On 27 Jan 2007, at 16:33, Lee Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Although I wouldn't complain about a free G.729 codec, I have to be
>> honest in saying that $10.00 isn't that great of an expense
>> considering the better call quality you get.
>
> Does G.729 work by pushing up the compression, therefore moving from
> work from the Network to the CPU ?  Across my LAN, I'd probably be
> able to handle *fewer*, rather than more calls across my * exchange
> if this was the case.  If it's cleverer that this, I think I'll have
> to speculate a few dollars, assuming my Snoms can talk in G.729.
>
> cheers
> -a
>
> --
> Regards, Andy Davidson
> http://www.devonshire.it/  -  0844 704 704 7  - Sheffield, UK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>