[asterisk-users] NAT solutions

[Bernardo Vieira]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Bernardo,
> 
> Just a thought:  Try using a different SIP port for one of the
> extensions, if possible.
> 
> Bob...
Bob,
Tanks for the tip. I had actually done that before, as a matte of fact
that's the solution I have in place now. The thing is, even though it
works it is not exactly the best solution as it forces some non-standard
configuration on the clients. It's not my case, but imagine  the hassled
it would impose in an ITSP environment.

Bernardo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFsPHM2QVs8jsa1mQRArzQAJ4lZCEVhUX7zi8+rIQ79/335SeOzACdFPU4
nMXe9lmVnzLZKK6uTJqUlzo=
=9N1q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----