[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed Feb 21 23:54:42 MST 2007
BTW Carlos, all your posts are with "Importance: High" in this thread.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 08:35:12PM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote:
> Axel,
>
> Thanks for your advice, but as I tried to found the real problem overpass
> the search is just like close my eyes.
Not really what I was suggesting, see below.
> I'm trying to learn in order to not repeat same mistake twice. I don't know
> how the rpm's are build, and I don't think that
> You can apply on every kind of variation you can find. Also, there are
> additional functions I going to add, that are directly related
> To the full system, so I cannot drive this on blind packages.
>
> Thanks a lot, but I'm going to search for the solution and find what mistake
> I made.
Packages, either rpms, debs, ebuilds or any other technology allow you
not only to blindly use them, but in fact you can rebuild them, modify
them source-wise at will or simply be reviewed for seeing how to build
something.
A src.rpm is a collection of source, patches and a specfile which is
more or less a recipe on how to build and install the
sources/patches. So if you want to go the build-from-scratch route,
you can look at how the packages were built, and either manually
repeat the steps or letting rpmbuild do that for you.
And if you need modifications you can do that at package level, too, a
patch usually takes two lines to be added. Finally if your
modifications could be generally useful you can submit the changes
back for the next package update to cover them.
> Carlos Alperin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Axel Thimm
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:06 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:01:35AM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote:
> > I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5
> > x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer
> > kernel versions.
>
> If you want to save these hassles, why not use the packages bits that are
> available for FC5/FC6/RHEL4/RHEL3 i386/x86_64/ppc? There are even packages
> for the upcoming F7 and RHEL5 available:
>
> http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk/
> http://atrpms.net/name/zaptel/
>
> If you add atrpms to your yum config all you have to do is
>
> yum install asterisk zaptel zaptel-kmdl-`uname -r`
>
> If you want yum to automatically install new kmdls for new kernels also
> install yum-plugin-kmdl, and then you only need to use yum update and not
> worry again (or worry less ...).
>
> > I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I
> > finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I
> > run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy.
> >
> > I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but doesn't work.
> >
> > I'm running make linux26, & make install. Also, I have the kernel
> > sources, and a symlink to /lib/modules/....
> >
> > Also, I tried the make install-udev, since there was no zap device on
> > /dev/zap but nothing.
> >
> > The error is that when I run modprobe the result is FATAL NO ZAPTEL
> > MODULE FOUND.
> >
> > Any clue about this?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos Alperin
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070221/b7c13155/attachment.pgp
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list