[asterisk-users] Re: Setting Caller-ID / Point Codes

[Trevor G. Hammonds]

Matt,

A Letter of Agency is almost always signed by the end subscriber and given
to the ILEC/CLEC.  Its purpose is to allow someone other than the subscriber
(e.g. an "Enhanced Service Provider" or consultant) to make changes to, or
get information about, the customer's account (e.g. your account with the
CLEC).  

 

I am not sure how you are set up.  Are you a subscriber of the CLEC, or does
your ITSP get the DIDs from the CLEC?  

 

I would be interested in knowing more about the company you are using for
the CNAM stuff.  If you feel you should not disclose the information
publicly, please e-mail me off list.

 

                                Sincerely,

                                Trevor Hammonds

 

 

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:14 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Commercial and
Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Setting Caller-ID / Point Codes

 

Bump.  Nothing heard.

On 2/19/07, Matt <mhoppes at gmail.com> wrote:

Greetings folks,
I'm currently dealing with a company to let me set Caller-ID-Name on
outbound calls.  So far pretty happy with their services.  The basic service
works like this:

* CLEC sets Point Code to point to this company 
* CLEC has to sign LOA saying they give me permission to set the
Caller-ID-Name through this company.
* I go into web interface and set name.

However, the CLEC is currently asking questions about the LOA, and I am
concerned they may not sign it. 

What do other people here know about this procedure.  Have any of you signed
up with a company to allow you to set the Caller-ID-Name?  If so, was an LOA
required?  Did your CLEC sign it?  Who do you all work with? 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070221/411169a0/attachment.htm