[asterisk-users] AsterikNow vs Trixbox
George Pajari
George.Pajari at netVOICE.ca
Mon Feb 12 15:09:52 MST 2007
Apart from the feature/maturity issue there is a far more important
(IMHO) difference in the architectural approach of the two GUIs.
FreePBX assumes it owns the world and completely re-writes its
configuration files once changes are made through the GUI. While it
makes token efforts to enable one to edit "custom" files which are
includes into the configuration files -- the ability to make significant
manual changes to the dialplan while still using the GUI is limited and
challenging.
AsteriskNOW's GUI (which still in its early days) takes a much less
dictatorial approach and will, to a much greater degree, cooperate with
manual configuration changes.
Because of the difficulty of manually tweaking configurations generated
by FreePBX, I have had to remove FreePBX from every customer who has
started down this road (since they inevitably ask for something that
cannot be configured through FreePBX and that requires manual tweaks).
While I have no yet deployed a 1.4 system with the Asterisk GUI at a
customer site, my early experiments in the lab suggest that Digium's
approach will be much more cooperative and flexible.
g.
--
George Pajari, netVOICE communications 604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102)
Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102)
www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.ca
www.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list